Psicología moral
La psicología moral es un campo de estudio que se ubica en la intersección entre la filosofía y la psicología. Abarca áreas como el razonamiento moral, el desarrollo moral, la motivación moral y los orígenes evolutivos de la moral.
Los altruistas eficaces han recurrido la psicología moral para examinar, entre otras cosas, la donación eficaz,1 el riesgo existencial,2 la ética de la población,3 el futuro,4 el especismo,5 el utilitarismo,6 la motivación altruista,7 el vínculo entre las donaciones y la felicidad8 y los rasgos de personalidad de los altruistas eficaces.9
Más información
Spencer Greenberg (2021) EA efficacy and community norms with Stefan Schubert, Clearer Thinking, 29 de mayo.
Entradas relacionadas
descuento temporal • donación eficaz • especismo • ética de la población • insensibilidad al alcance • riesgo existencial • sesgos cognitivos • utilitarismo
Dean Karlan, John A. List & Eldar Shafir (2011) Small matches and charitable giving: evidence from a natural field experiment, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 95, pp. 344–350; Lucius Caviola et al. (2014) The evaluability bias in charitable giving: saving administration costs or saving lives?, Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 9, pp. 303–315; Lucius Caviola, Stefan Schubert & Jason Nemirow (2020) The many obstacles to effective giving, Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15, pp. 159–172; Bethany Burum, Martin A. Nowak & Moshe Hoffman (2020) An evolutionary explanation for ineffective altruism, Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 4, pp. 1245–1257; Lucius Caviola, Stefan Schubert & Joshua D. Greene (2021) The psychology of (in)effective altruism, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 25, pp. 596–607; Stefan Schubert (2018) Why aren’t people donating more effectively?, Effective Altruism Global, 8 de junio; Jonathan Z. Berman et al. (2018) Impediments to effective altruism: The role of subjective preferences in charitable giving, Psychological Science, vol. 29, pp. 834–844.
Stefan Schubert, Lucius Caviola & Nadira S. Faber (2019) The psychology of existential risk: moral judgments about human extinction, Scientific Reports, vol. 9, 15100, pp. 1–8.
Lucius Caviola et al. (2022) Population ethical intuitions, Cognition, vol. 218, 104941.
Aron Vallinder (2019) Psychology of the future: Bibliography, inédito.
Lucius Caviola (2019) How We Value Animals: The Psychology of Speciesism, tesis doctoral, Universidad de Oxford; Lucius Caviola, Jim A. C. Everett & Nadira S. Faber (2019) The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 116, pp. 1011–1029; Lucius Caviola & Valerio Capraro (2020) Liking but devaluing animals: emotional and deliberative paths to speciesism, Social Psychological and Personality Science, vol. 11, 8.
Guy Kahane et al. (2018) Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology, Psychological Review, vol. 125, pp. 131–164; Jim A. C. Everett & Guy Kahane (2020) Switching tracks? Towards a multidimensional model of utilitarian psychology, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 124–134.
Kyle Fiore Law, Dylan Campbell & Brendan Gaesser (2021) Biased benevolence: The perceived morality of effective altruism across social distance, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 53, pp. 426–444.
William MacAskill, Andreas Mogensen & Toby Ord (2023) ‘Donar no es exigente’, Altruismo Eficaz; Max Dalton (2020) Some extremely rough research on giving and happiness, Effective Altruism Forum, 9 de septiembre.
Elizabeth E. (2020) Correlations between cause prioritization and the big five personality traits, Effective Altruism Forum, 24 de septiembre.